All blackboards are gone. They were replaced during the break. (So, no chance to use this MathOverflow question on the near future.) Makes me think of T.H. Huxley’s On a Piece of Chalk (see here) and wonder what the equivalent will be in a few decades.

On the plus side, we now have computers and projection equipment on each classroom. I am using this quite a bit in my abstract algebra class. Except that, during the first few weeks, it was more often than not that the keyboard would be locked away.

Annoyed, I called OIT and asked that they please make sure it was unlocked before my class. It worked for a few days. But then, again, I found it locked.

I called again (I was charming, I am sure). So, somebody came to the classroom, looked at me, smiled. And pressed a button, to open the drawer.

Sigh.

(In my defense, the class is at 8:30 in the morning, and I’m supposed to drink less coffee these days. But still.)

(“Thanks. I’m sorry. I’m an idiot.” “Oh, no, no. It is new.” “It is a button.”)

This entry was posted on Sunday, February 19th, 2012 at 4:26 pm and is filed under Life. You can follow any responses to this entry through the RSS 2.0 feed.
You can leave a response, or trackback from your own site.

Have you had a chance to use a tablet+projection to replace the whiteboard? Infinite paper with infinite zoom to add additional comments in the right place is a great tool I use for taking notes, but never had a chance to use in class.

I thought about this question a while ago, while teaching a topics course. Since one can easily check that $${}|{\mathbb R}|=|{\mathcal P}({\mathbb N})|$$ by a direct construction that does not involve diagonalization, the question can be restated as: Is there a proof of Cantor's theorem that ${}|X|

(I am replacing prior nonsense with a completely different suggestion. I am also turning this into CW so details can be added by somebody with time (which, sadly, most likely won't be me). Comments prior to Feb. 9, 2011, refer to said prior nonsense.) Start with $V=L$ and force to add a Mathias real $s$. Let $W$ be the resulting extension. Let $A$ be th […]

(1) Patrick Dehornoy gave a nice talk at the Séminaire Bourbaki explaining Hugh Woodin's approach. It omits many technical details, so you may want to look at it before looking again at the Notices papers. I think looking at those slides and then at the Notices articles gives a reasonable picture of what the approach is and what kind of problems remain […]

It is open whether the continuum hypothesis for an infinite set $E$ implies the well-orderability of $E$. Of course, if $CH(E)$ holds, then the assumption in your (first) statement holds. ($CH(E)$ is the statement that any subset $A$ of $\mathcal P(E)$, either $A$ injects into $E$, or else $A$ is in bijection with $\mathcal P(E)$.) This is a question that da […]

I saw a while ago in a book by Clifford Pickover, that whether $\displaystyle \sum_{n=1}^\infty\frac1{n^3\sin^2 n}$ converges is open. I would think that the question of its convergence is really about the density in $\mathbb N$ of the sequence of numerators of the standard convergent approximations to $\pi$ (which, in itself, seems like an interesting quest […]

Assuming that (choice holds and) $\mathrm{V}=C^\kappa$, we can prove the version of $\mathsf{GCH}$ stated in the paper, that for every $\nu>1$, $$2^{\nu^{

Some suggestions: Cohen forcing is a fairly well-understood and studied forcing notion. To say that $\mathbb L^2$ is "uninteresting" could simply mean that we end up with a notion of forcing about which we already know all there is to know. (Though, of course, this is an exaggeration.) However, I do not quite buy that this is the sense in which the […]

First of all, the integer interval $A=[0,(p-1)/2]$ has $(p+1)/2$ elements. If the function $a\mapsto a^2\pmod p$ from $A$ into the set of residue classes modulo $p$ is injective, its image has size $(p+1)/2$ as well. But the function is injective, since $a^2\equiv b^2\pmod p$ implies that $p\mid(a-b)(a+b)$, so $p\mid (a-b)$ or $p\mid(a+b)$. But if $a,b\in A$ […]

Let me write $PA$ for $P(A)$, to save us some parentheses. Note first that the invariance under translation gives us that $P\{0\}=P\{x\}$ for all $x\in[0,1]$. I claim that this common value must be different from $0$. The reason is that, otherwise, $P[a,b]=P(a,b]=P[a,b)=P(a,b)$ for all $a\le b$, a contradiction. It follows that $P\{0\}=P\{x\}\ne0$. Countable […]

I will focus mostly in the follow-up question of whether there is progress on the continuum problem, but along the way I mention some of the results relating $\mathsf{AC}$ and $\mathsf{CH}$. First of all, in the context of first order $\mathsf{ZF}$, neither statement implies the other, and each of the four possible combinations is relatively consistent with […]

This is quite hilarious (I sympathize).

Have you had a chance to use a tablet+projection to replace the whiteboard? Infinite paper with infinite zoom to add additional comments in the right place is a great tool I use for taking notes, but never had a chance to use in class.

I haven’t, but I probably should. I’ve heard Hugh Woodin uses this quite effectively teaching precalculus, of all things.