The cabinet of Doctor Caligari is a 1920 German expressionist film. It is in fact one of the earliest examples of expressionism in films, and the imagery is an important part of the story. Told in a long flashback, within which another flashback occurs, The cabinet tells of a young man whose friend is murdered and his life is completely turned upside down by the mysterious Doctor Caligari and his assistant the somnambulist Cesare.

I must say I figured the ending of the story from the very beginning, so I am not sure how much of a plot twist it was intended to be, although according to the film commentary, the original script was different precisely because it did not have this end, which was added by the director. I think it is the end what makes the film work as a narrative and not just as an artistic experiment.

The score that accompanies the DVD version I saw was composed for the DVD. Apparently, early silent movies were to be shown with a score playing on the background, but it was the responsability of the theatre showing the film to provide this music. It certainly was a nice addition to the mood of the story and I must say that recent exposure to early films has made me realize how important and carefully planned music used to be while in most mainstream movies nowadays it is loud and distracting.

Part of what I enjoy looking at in old films is the way storytelling conventions have evolved, the way scenes are framed, how they fade, or how attention is drawn to particular areas or characters. Due to the highly artificial scenery in this story, most sets seem to only work from one position, so there are some curious technical difficulties the director has to overcome here. There are also a few other peculiarities, like how areas of the set where an important action occurs are “illuminated,” or the excessive use of make-up by some of the characters, which gives the whole story an odd and somewhat dreamlike quality. Very nice.

Advertisements

Like this:

LikeLoading...

Related

This entry was posted on Monday, February 5th, 2007 at 4:06 pm and is filed under Movies. You can follow any responses to this entry through the RSS 2.0 feed.
You can leave a response, or trackback from your own site.

(1) Patrick Dehornoy gave a nice talk at the Séminaire Bourbaki explaining Hugh Woodin's approach. It omits many technical details, so you may want to look at it before looking again at the Notices papers. I think looking at those slides and then at the Notices articles gives a reasonable picture of what the approach is and what kind of problems remain […]

The description below comes from József Beck. Combinatorial games. Tic-tac-toe theory, Encyclopedia of Mathematics and its Applications, 114. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, 2008, MR2402857 (2009g:91038). Given a finite set $S$ of points in the plane $\mathbb R^2$, consider the following game between two players Maker and Breaker. The players alternat […]

Yes. This is a consequence of the Davis-Matiyasevich-Putnam-Robinson work on Hilbert's 10th problem, and some standard number theory. A number of papers have details of the $\Pi^0_1$ sentence. To begin with, take a look at the relevant paper in Mathematical developments arising from Hilbert's problems (Proc. Sympos. Pure Math., Northern Illinois Un […]

I am looking for references discussing two inequalities that come up in the study of the dynamics of Newton's method on real-valued polynomials (in one variable). The inequalities are fairly different, but it seems to make sense to ask about both of them in the same post. Most of the details below are fairly elementary, they are mostly included for comp […]

Let $C$ be the standard Cantor middle-third set. As a consequence of the Baire category theorem, there are numbers $r$ such that $C+r$ consists solely of irrational numbers, see here. What would be an explicit example of a number $r$ with this property? Short of an explicit example, are there any references addressing this question? A natural approach would […]

First of all, $f(z)+e^z\ne 0$ by the first inequality. It follows that $e^z/(f(z)+e^z)$ is entire, and bounded above. You should be able to conclude from that.

Yes. The standard way of defining these sequences goes by assigning in an explicit fashion to each limit ordinal $\alpha$, for as long as possible, an increasing sequence $\alpha_n$ that converges to $\alpha$. Once this is done, we can define $f_\alpha$ by diagonalizing, so $f_\alpha(n)=f_{\alpha_n}(n)$ for all $n$. Of course there are many possible choices […]

I disagree with the advice of sending a paper to a journal before searching the relevant literature. It is almost guaranteed that a paper on the fundamental theorem of algebra (a very classical and well-studied topic) will be rejected if you do not include mention on previous proofs, and comparisons, explaining how your proof differs from them, etc. It is no […]

No, the rank of a set $x$ is the least $\alpha$ such that $x\in V_{\alpha+1}$. Note that if $\alpha$ is limit, any $x\in V_\alpha$ belongs to some $V_\beta$ with $\beta