We proved König’s theorem and results of Hausdorff and Tarski on cardinal exponentiation, indicated some of their consequences (for example, ), and showed how to compute under
the function
.
We stated Easton’s result essentially saying that without additional assumptions, in nothing can be said about the exponential function
beyond monotonicity and König’s theorem.
For singular cardinals the situation is much more delicate. We stated as a sample result Shelah’s theorem that if is strong limit, then
is regular and smaller than
.
This result is beyond the scope of this course. Instead, we will prove a particular case of an earlier result of Silver, namely, that is not the first counterexample to
.
In order to prove Silver’s result, we need to develop the theory of club and stationary sets. We defined these notions and proved some of their basic properties.
What does it mean for the continuum function to be “eventually constant” below K. I am trying to read Thomas Jech. He uses the phrase “eventually constant” frequently but does not define it.
Hi David,
I imagine K is some limit cardinal
? The phrase means that there is some cardinal
such that for some fixed cardinal
and for all cardinals
in the interval
we have that 
(Although the first time one sees this, it is a bit puzzling, this situation is consistently possible.)