116c- Lecture 18

We briefly discussed relative constructibility and compared the models L[x] where x is exclusively treated as a predicate with the models L(x) where x is an element. In particular, L[x] is a model of choice but L(x) may fail to be.

An amusing application of the fact that L[x]models{sf AC} is that the result of Exercise 3 from Homework 7 holds in {sf ZF}, although the proof I wrote there uses choice. Namely, work in {sf ZF} and consider two well-orderings of a set X. We can assume that X is an ordinal alpha and the first well-ordering is in. Let prec be the second well-ordering. Then precin L[prec] (since prec is a set of ordered pairs of ordinals). In L[prec], where choice holds, (and therefore also in V) there is a subset of alpha of the same size as alpha and where prec coincides with in.

Question. Find a `choice-free’ argument for Exercise 3. 

The main example we will consider of a model of the form L(x) is L({mathbb R}), due to its connection with determinacy.

We introduced the setting to discuss determinacy, namely infinite 2-person games with perfect information. We proved the Gale-Stewart theorem that open games are determined and discussed Martin’s extension to Borel games. A nice reference for the proof of Martin’s result (using the idea of `unraveling‘, which reduces any Borel game to an open game in a different space) is Kechris’s book on descriptive set theory.


One Response to 116c- Lecture 18

  1. […] I present here a quick sketch of the solution of Exercise 3.(b). See Lecture 18, where it is shown that the result actually holds in , although the proof uses […]

Leave a Reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in:

WordPress.com Logo

You are commenting using your WordPress.com account. Log Out / Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out / Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out / Change )

Google+ photo

You are commenting using your Google+ account. Log Out / Change )

Connecting to %s

%d bloggers like this: