Here is the Maple worksheet I tried to follow on Friday. I am including also three topographical maps to illustrate the fact that rivers follow paths of steepest descent. Unfortunately, the resolution is not ideal in any of the examples. If you know of a good free online source for decent topo maps, please let me know.

The first map (greatlakesarea) was obtained through the my-topo.com site.

The other two maps (colombia1, colombia2) were obatined through the site for the Instituto Geografico Agustin Codazzi.

Here is the Maple worksheet: directionalderivatives. Unfortunately, wordpress only allows one to upload files from a very small number of applications, so I have changed the extension from .mw to .doc, and you may want to change it back after downloading. I am somewhat rusty in my knowledge of Maple, so I don’t remember how to change the lighting in graphics directly through the code (if you know how, please let me know). To see the surfaces better, you may want to click on them so the “Plot” menu activates, and there you want to choose something like Light Scheme 1 under Lighting. You may also rotate the graphs, to see them from different angles, which helps appreciate better some of the details (like the ring of directions in the tangent plane in one of the examples).

[There is a typo, of course. At the end, where it says , it should be .]

Advertisements

Like this:

LikeLoading...

Related

This entry was posted on Sunday, October 12th, 2008 at 9:38 pm and is filed under 275: Calculus III. You can follow any responses to this entry through the RSS 2.0 feed.
You can leave a response, or trackback from your own site.

(1) Patrick Dehornoy gave a nice talk at the Séminaire Bourbaki explaining Hugh Woodin's approach. It omits many technical details, so you may want to look at it before looking again at the Notices papers. I think looking at those slides and then at the Notices articles gives a reasonable picture of what the approach is and what kind of problems remain […]

The description below comes from József Beck. Combinatorial games. Tic-tac-toe theory, Encyclopedia of Mathematics and its Applications, 114. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, 2008, MR2402857 (2009g:91038). Given a finite set $S$ of points in the plane $\mathbb R^2$, consider the following game between two players Maker and Breaker. The players alternat […]

Yes. This is a consequence of the Davis-Matiyasevich-Putnam-Robinson work on Hilbert's 10th problem, and some standard number theory. A number of papers have details of the $\Pi^0_1$ sentence. To begin with, take a look at the relevant paper in Mathematical developments arising from Hilbert's problems (Proc. Sympos. Pure Math., Northern Illinois Un […]

I am looking for references discussing two inequalities that come up in the study of the dynamics of Newton's method on real-valued polynomials (in one variable). The inequalities are fairly different, but it seems to make sense to ask about both of them in the same post. Most of the details below are fairly elementary, they are mostly included for comp […]

Let $C$ be the standard Cantor middle-third set. As a consequence of the Baire category theorem, there are numbers $r$ such that $C+r$ consists solely of irrational numbers, see here. What would be an explicit example of a number $r$ with this property? Short of an explicit example, are there any references addressing this question? A natural approach would […]

First of all, $f(z)+e^z\ne 0$ by the first inequality. It follows that $e^z/(f(z)+e^z)$ is entire, and bounded above. You should be able to conclude from that.

Yes. The standard way of defining these sequences goes by assigning in an explicit fashion to each limit ordinal $\alpha$, for as long as possible, an increasing sequence $\alpha_n$ that converges to $\alpha$. Once this is done, we can define $f_\alpha$ by diagonalizing, so $f_\alpha(n)=f_{\alpha_n}(n)$ for all $n$. Of course there are many possible choices […]

I disagree with the advice of sending a paper to a journal before searching the relevant literature. It is almost guaranteed that a paper on the fundamental theorem of algebra (a very classical and well-studied topic) will be rejected if you do not include mention on previous proofs, and comparisons, explaining how your proof differs from them, etc. It is no […]

No, the rank of a set $x$ is the least $\alpha$ such that $x\in V_{\alpha+1}$. Note that if $\alpha$ is limit, any $x\in V_\alpha$ belongs to some $V_\beta$ with $\beta