The topic of this course is Combinatorial set theory, so even though we will study additional axioms, we will not emphasize forcing or inner model-theoretic techniques. Similarly, we will study some results of a descriptive set theoretic nature, but will not delve into the fine definability issues that descriptive set theory involves. We will assume the axiom of choice throughout (and I will assume basic knowledge of axiomatic set theory, cardinals and ordinals), but we begin by looking at some results that do not require the axiom of choice.
1. Cantor’s theorem
Version 1. If then is not surjective.
Proof. Let . Then .
Version 2. If then is not injective.
Proof. Let and set so , so there is some with .
Note that in version 1 we explicitly (i.e., definably) found a set not in the range of . In version 2, we found a set for which there is a set with witnessing a failure of injectivity, but we did not actually define such a set . I do not know whether this can be done; we will see later a different argument in which such a pair is defined.
2. The Tarski-Knaster theorem.
Theorem. Let be a complete lattice, and let be order preserving. Then the set of fixed points of is a complete lattice (and, in particular, non-empty).
This is a handout on this result that I wrote for a set theory course I taught at Caltech.
3. The Schröder-Bernstein theorem.
Theorem. Assume that there are injections and . Then there is a bijection .
This is proved as a corollary of the Tarski-Knaster result, see the handout attached above.
Another nice way of proving the result is graph theoretic. We may assume that and are disjoint and form a directed graph whose nodes are elements of and there is an edge from to iff either and or and . Consider the connected components of this graph. Each component is either a cycle of even length, or a -chain, or a -chain. In each case, one can canonically find a bijection between the elements of the component in and the elements in . Putting these bijections together gives the result.
Cantor’s proof of this result uses the axiom of choice (in the form: every set is in bijection with an ordinal).