(This post was typeset using Luca Trevisan‘s LaTeX2WP program.)
Last lecture we characterized subfields and used the characterization to provide many new examples of fields. Now we start to explore systematically which subfields of the complex numbers are suitable to study the question of which polynomial equations can be solved.
1. Extensions
Definition 1 If
is a field and
is a subfield, we write
and also say that
is an extension of
![]()
For example,
Definition 2 If
is a field,
and
we denote by
the smallest subfield of
that contains both
and
If
we write
We say that
is the subfield of
generated by
over
![]()
For example, last lecture we showed that
“Smallest” in the definition above refers to containment. Put another way, we are claiming that there is a field that contains
and
and such that given any subfield
of
that also contains
and
then
This requires an argument.
Theorem 3 Let
be a field. Let
be a nonempty collection of subfields of
Then
is a field.
Proof: We use the characterization from last lecture to show that is a subfield of
It is straightforward to check that this set is closed under addition and multiplication (since all the fields in
are), and that it contains additive and multiplicative inverses of all its (nonzero) elements. It also has at least two elements, since
for any field
Corollary 4 If
is a field,
and
then
exists.
Proof: Let be the collection of subfields of
that contain both
and
Note that
since
Then
is a field, it contains both
and
and is contained in any subfield of
that contains both
and
by definition of
Therefore,
This is a characterization “from above.” As in the case of in many concrete examples it is possible to give a simple description (a characterization “from below”) of
but this is in general a difficult problem.
Proof: We already know that By induction,
for all
since
is closed under addition. Since
is closed under additive inverses,
Since
is closed under multiplicative inverses (of nonzero elements) and under multiplication, then
Recall Gauß’ fundamental theorem of algebra, that we will take for granted in what follows. (That we take it for granted does not mean that this is an easy result. All its known proofs use deep facts about either about its algebraic structure or its analytic structure.)
Theorem 6 (Gauß) Let
be a nonconstant polynomial with complex coefficients. Then
has at least one complex root, i.e., there is some
such that
By induction, it follows that if
has degree
then it has exactly
roots, taking into account their multiplicity.
![]()
Definition 7 Let
be a subfield of
and let
be a nonconstant polynomial with coefficients in
. Then
denotes the smallest subfield of
that contains
and the roots of
![]()
We will usually use this notation with in place of
In this case, thanks to Proposition 5, we have that
is simply the smallest subfield of
that contains the roots of
For example, if then
Clearly, This extension has several interesting properties. For example, it is a vector space over
Next lecture we will study the important case when
is an extension by radicals.
(Here is a printable version of this post.)
[…] Last lecture we defined where is a subfield of a field all the roots of the polynomial are in and all the coefficients of are in Namely, if are the roots of then the field generated by over […]
[…] 305 -5. Extensions by radicals – http://caicedoteaching.wordpress.com/2009/03/04/305-5-extensions-by-radicals/ […]
[…] Last lecture we defined where is a subfield of a field all the roots of the polynomial are in and all the coefficients of are in Namely, if are the roots of then the field generated by over […]