In order to understand the construction of the quotient ring from last lecture, it is convenient to examine some examples in details. We are interested in ideals of
where
is a field. We write
for the quotient ring, i.e., the set of equivalence classes
of polynomials
in
under the equivalence relation
iff
- If
then for any
the equivalence class
is just the singleton
and the homomorphism map
given by
is an isomorphism.
To understand general ideals better the following notions are useful; I restrict to commutative rings with identity although they make sense in other contexts as well:
Definition 1 Let
be a commutative ring with identity. An ideal
is principal iff it is the ideal generated by an element
of
i.e., it is the set
of all products
for
![]()
For example, is principal. In
every subring is an ideal and is principal, since all subrings of
are of the form
for some integer
Definition 2 An integral domain is a commutative ring
with identity wher
and without zero divisors. Recall that
is a zero divisor iff
and there is some
such that
![]()
For example, in any nonzero
with
is a zero divisor: Let
and consider
Then
Definition 3 A unit in a commutative ring
with identity is an
for which there is some
such that
We write
for the set of units of
![]()
For example, in any
with
is a unit: Recall that if
then there are integers
such that
so if
then
If is a field,
since every nonzero element has an inverse.
If is a field, then
To see this, recall that the degree
of a polynomial
is
if
and it is
if the largest power of
that appears in
with a nonzero coefficient is
Suppose that
are nonzero polynomials in
Say that
and
so there are coefficients
and
with
not zero, such that
Then since the coefficient of
in the product
is the sum of all the coefficients
with
Of course, this is nonzero only if
and
so
Moreover, the coefficient of
in
is
which is nonzero since a field has no zero divisors.
This shows that if both
are nonzero. If one of them is zero, then
as well, and
is true due to our convention that
It is clear now that if is a unit in
then
since otherwise
for any nonzero
but then
But
means that
is a nonzero constant, i.e., a nonzero element of
Notice that this argument also shows that is an integral domain, as we showed that
whenever both
are nonzero.
Definition 4 An integral domain
is a principal ideal domain (pid) iff every ideal of
is principal.
For example, any field is a principal ideal domain, although this example is somewhat trivial:
More generally, suppose is a commutative ring with identity and let
be an ideal of
Suppose that
contains a unit. Then
because if
is a unit then there is some
such that
and so
for any
Since ideals are closed under multiplication by any element of
it follows that
Since
was arbitrary,
Now, if is a field, then every nonzero element of
is a unit, and we have that any ideal is either
or
A more interesting example is That this is a pid is shown in detail in Chapter 8 of the book, that I highly recommend you study carefully. The argument resembles strongly results we showed for the integers.
The idea is this:
- First, in
we have a division algorithm,
so given any nonzero polynomials in
there are unique polynomials
in
with
and such that
Note in particular that if
i.e., if
is a (nonzero) constant, then
as
must be zero.
In fact, we can generalize to the notion of greatest common divisor:
Definition 5 If
are nonzero polynomials in
a greatest common divisor (gcd) of
is any nonzero polynomial
such that:
and
![]()
- Whenever
is a polynomial in
and
and
then
![]()
So any nonzero polynomials may admit more than one gcd, since if
is a gcd of
then so is
for any
On the other hand, this is the only obstacle to uniqueness: If
are both gcds of
then
and
so
and there is a unit
such that
- Second, in
we have an Euclidean algorithm,
so by repeated application of the division algorithm we can find a gcd of any two nonzero polynomials moreover, there are polynomials
such that
is a gcd of
Using this one can easily show that any ideal in is principal, just as we did for
We’ll revisit the details after the break, and they are in Chapter 8 of the book, but it is important that you notice that we are basically repeating the proofs we already know.
Just as with once we have a notion of gcd and an Euclidean algorithm, we can talk about prime or irreducible elements in
Once we have this notion, we will revisit the construction of the quotient rings
and study their properties.
Typeset using LaTeX2WP. Here is a printable version of this post.
[…] Let’s conclude the discussion from last lecture. […]
[…] Let’s conclude the discussion from last lecture. […]