175 – Integrating products of secants and tangents

(In what follows, I will write for and for )

Recall that

that

and that

The formulas below make use of these identities repeatedly.

We want a series of methods and reduction formulas that allow us to evaluate any expression of the form

for and integers,

1. Integrating powers of

In lecture we saw that

and derived the following reduction formula for integrating powers of

This formula is valid for any

(The integral of was obtained by what is essentially the method of partial fractions, that we will study in detail when we reach section 7.4 in the book. The reduction formula was obtained using integration by parts.)

Exercise 1Find and

2. Integrating powers of

We also saw that

and derived the following reduction formula:

valid for all

Exercise 2Find and

3. Integrating products of powers of and

Suppose now that we need to evaluate an expression of the form

where both and are at least 1. As in the case of integrals of products of powers of sines and cosines, it is best to divide the problem into two cases.

3.1. If is odd

Suppose first that is odd, say for some integer Then

Since we can write The last integral can then be expressed in the form

This can be easily evaluated using the substitution that transforms it into

To evaluate this expression, expand and multiply the result by This gives us a polynomial in We can integrate the polynomial term by term, and then replace back in place of

Exercise 3Find and

3.2. If is even

Suppose now that is even, say for some integer Then

To evaluate this expression, expand and multiply the result by This gives us a sum of powers of that can be evaluated term by term using the reduction formula from Section 1. Note that this method works even if

Exercise 4Find

Exercise 5Find using this method, and show that your answer actually gives the same result as the answer you found in Exercise 2.

4. Integrating powers of and

Exercise 6(This is long.) Explain how to adapt the methods from the previous sections to find any integral of the form Then repeat the previous exercises but with in place of and instead of

Although I am not writing this as an exercise, it is a good idea to also spend some time thinking about what one would do with integrals of products of powers of and or of and or of all four expressions.

Typeset using LaTeX2WP. Here is a printable version of this post.

43.614000-116.202000

Advertisements

Like this:

LikeLoading...

Related

This entry was posted on Friday, October 9th, 2009 at 11:04 am and is filed under 175: Calculus II. You can follow any responses to this entry through the RSS 2.0 feed.
You can leave a response, or trackback from your own site.

Craig: For a while, there was some research on improving bounds on the number of variables or degree of unsolvable Diophantine equations. Unfortunately, I never got around to cataloging the known results in any systematic way, so all I can offer is some pointers to relevant references, but I am not sure of what the current records are. Perhaps the first pape […]

Yes. Consider, for instance, Conway's base 13 function $c$, or any function that is everywhere discontinuous and has range $\mathbb R$ in every interval. Pick continuous bijections $f_n:\mathbb R\to(-1/n,1/n)$ for $n\in\mathbb N^+$. Pick a strictly decreasing sequence $(x_n)_{n\ge1}$ converging to $0$. Define $f$ by setting $f(x)=0$ if $x=0$ or $\pm x_n […]

(1) Patrick Dehornoy gave a nice talk at the Séminaire Bourbaki explaining Hugh Woodin's approach. It omits many technical details, so you may want to look at it before looking again at the Notices papers. I think looking at those slides and then at the Notices articles gives a reasonable picture of what the approach is and what kind of problems remain […]

The description below comes from József Beck. Combinatorial games. Tic-tac-toe theory, Encyclopedia of Mathematics and its Applications, 114. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, 2008, MR2402857 (2009g:91038). Given a finite set $S$ of points in the plane $\mathbb R^2$, consider the following game between two players Maker and Breaker. The players alternat […]

Yes. This is a consequence of the Davis-Matiyasevich-Putnam-Robinson work on Hilbert's 10th problem, and some standard number theory. A number of papers have details of the $\Pi^0_1$ sentence. To begin with, take a look at the relevant paper in Mathematical developments arising from Hilbert's problems (Proc. Sympos. Pure Math., Northern Illinois Un […]

It is easy to see without choice that if there is a surjection from $A$ onto $B$, then there is an injection from ${\mathcal P}(B)$ into ${\mathcal P}(A)$, and the result follows from Cantor's theorem that $B

Only noticed this question today. Although the selected answer is quite nice and arguably simpler than the argument below, none of the posted answers address what appeared to be the original intent of establishing the inequality using the Arithmetic Mean-Geometric Mean Inequality. For this, simply notice that $$ 1+3+\ldots+(2n-1)=n^2, $$ which can be easily […]

First of all, $f(z)+e^z\ne 0$ by the first inequality. It follows that $e^z/(f(z)+e^z)$ is entire, and bounded above. You should be able to conclude from that.

Yes. The standard way of defining these sequences goes by assigning in an explicit fashion to each limit ordinal $\alpha$, for as long as possible, an increasing sequence $\alpha_n$ that converges to $\alpha$. Once this is done, we can define $f_\alpha$ by diagonalizing, so $f_\alpha(n)=f_{\alpha_n}(n)$ for all $n$. Of course there are many possible choices […]

I disagree with the advice of sending a paper to a journal before searching the relevant literature. It is almost guaranteed that a paper on the fundamental theorem of algebra (a very classical and well-studied topic) will be rejected if you do not include mention on previous proofs, and comparisons, explaining how your proof differs from them, etc. It is no […]