Here is the second midterm.
Question 1: Find the volume of the solid obtained by rotating about the -axis the region between the
-axis and the curve
for
.
Here is a graph of in the specified region. To compute the volume, we use the shell method, and see that it is given by
We evaluate this integral using integration by parts.
We take: and
so
so
Question 2: Solve the initial value problem ,
.
We use the technique of separation of variables, and rewrite the given differential equation as:
so
To solve this integral, we begin by completing the square in the denominator of the given fraction:
This indicates that to solve the integral we want to use the trigonometric substitution
or
This gives:
We conclude by finding the value of , for which we use that
This gives us
or
Putting this together, we have
Question 3: Find .
To solve this integral, we use the technique of partial fractions decomposition, and begin by factoring
This means we need to find constants and
such that
As seen in class, there are several ways of doing this. For example, we can begin by adding the fractions on the right hand side, to obtain
This means that
for all values of . When
this gives
When , we have
When , we have
Finally, when we have
or
Putting this together, we have
and
[Actually, although this was not addressed in lecture, we can use different values of in each of the intervals
and
.]
Question 4: We have that . Suppose we do not know the value of
. We can use the trapezoidal rule to approximate it. Find a value of
such that the theoretical error for the trapezoidal rule using
subdivisions is strictly smaller than
. Find the approximation given by the trapezoidal rule using this
.
The error using the trapezoidal rule with
subintervals is bounded above by
where
and
where
To compute a bound on we first find
An easy way of bounding this expression is to note that is increasing for
with value
at
and value
for
so the maximum of its absolute value is
Similarly,
is decreasing, so it maximum occurs at
, where it is 1.
Hence is bounded above by
and
If we want it suffices that
or
so
The approximation is given by
which is indeed an accurate approximation to within
[Here is a graph of for
A more careful computation of
would have revealed that
which gives
(Note that
but
looks at the maximum of
not just
.)
The approximation gives the value
. A less careful computation, replacing
with
(so we do not have to worry about both positive and negative numbers) gives
, with
Actually,
works as well but the theoretical error does not predict this.]
Typeset using LaTeX2WP. Here is a printable version of this post.