Quiz 8 is here. Please remember that the second midterm is this Wednesday.

Solutions follow.

Problem 1 asks us to determine the local maxima and minma of .

We first note that the function is continuous and differentiable everywhere, except at , where is not even defined. We have

using the quotient rule. Since for all , it follows that the only solution to is . Since is and is , it follows that the only extreme point of occurs at , and it is a minimum.

This completes the problem, but it may be instructive to analyze the function a bit more.

Note that

and ,

so the -axis is a vertical asymptote at .

Also,

so the -axis is a horizontal asymptote as , while, using L’Hôpital’s rule, we have

.

Note that if and if . Also, from the sign of the derivative, is decreasing in and in , and it is increasing in .

Finally,

Clearly, if and if .

This means that is concave down in and concave up in .

Combining these observations allows us to sketch with reasonable accuracy. The graph of the function is shown below.

(Click the graph to enlarge.)

Problem 2 asks us to consider the function , and to indicate the intervals where it is increasing or decreasing, concave up, or concave down.

This function and its derivative are polynomials, so they are defined for all values of . First, we identify the values where .

We have

Next, we identify the values where .

We have

so , or , so or .

Note that , i.e., the zeroes of and of intertwine. (This is actually a general phenomenon.)

To determine the concavity of in the intervals determined by the zeroes of , we evaluate at points in the intervals and . Thanks to the second derivative test, we can save some time, and use these evaluations to (simultaneously) determine the extrema of and the intervals where increases and decreases.

We have , so is a local maximum of , and is concave down in .

Similarly, so is a local maximum of , and is concave down in .

Finally, , so is a local minimum of and is concave up in .

Moreover (due to the placement of its extreme points) we can also deduce that is increasing in decreasing in increasing in and decreasing in , so give us not just local maxima but global maxima of

This entry was posted on Sunday, October 24th, 2010 at 1:41 pm and is filed under 170: Calculus I. You can follow any responses to this entry through the RSS 2.0 feed.
You can leave a response, or trackback from your own site.

As suggested by Gerald, the notion was first introduced for groups. Given a directed system of groups, their direct limit was defined as a quotient of their direct product (which was referred to as their "weak product"). The general notion is a clear generalization, although the original reference only deals with groups. As mentioned by Cameron Zwa […]

A database of number fields, by Jürgen Klüners and Gunter Malle. (Note this is not the same as the one mentioned in this answer.) The site also provides links to similar databases.

As the other answer indicates, the yes answer to your question is known as the De Bruijn-Erdős theorem. This holds regardless of the size of the graph. The De Bruijn–Erdős theorem is a particular instance of what in combinatorics we call a compactness argument or Rado's selection principle, and its truth can be seen as a consequence of the topological c […]

Every $P_c$ has the size of the reals. For instance, suppose $\sum_n a_n=c$ and start by writing $\mathbb N=A\cup B$ where $\sum_{n\in A}a_n$ converges absolutely (to $a$, say). This is possible because $a_n\to 0$: Let $m_0

Consider a subset $\Omega$ of $\mathbb R$ of size $\aleph_1$ and ordered in type $\omega_1$. (This uses the axiom of choice.) Let $\mathcal F$ be the $\sigma$-algebra generated by the initial segments of $\Omega$ under the well-ordering (so all sets in $\mathcal F$ are countable or co-countable), with the measure that assigns $0$ to the countable sets and $1 […]

Sure. A large class of examples comes from the partition calculus. A simple result of the kind I have in mind is the following: Any infinite graph contains either a copy of the complete graph on countably many vertices or of the independent graph on countably many vertices. However, if we want to find an uncountable complete or independent graph, it is not e […]

I think that, from a modern point of view, there is a misunderstanding in the position that you suggest in your question. Really, "set theory" should be understood as an umbrella term that covers a whole hierarchy of ZFC-related theories. Perhaps one of the most significant advances in foundations is the identification of the consistency strength h […]

I'll only discuss the first question. As pointed out by Asaf, the argument is not correct, but something interesting can be said anyway. There are a couple of issues. A key problem is with the idea of an "explicitly constructed" set. Indeed, for instance, there are explicitly constructed sets of reals that are uncountable and of size continuum […]

The question seems to be: Assume that there is a Vitali set $V$. Is there an explicit bijection between $V$ and $\mathbb R$? The answer is yes, by an application of the Cantor-Schröder-Bernstein theorem: there is an explicit injection from $\mathbb R$ into $\mathbb R/\mathbb Q$ (provably in ZF, this requires some thought, or see the answers to this question) […]

If a set $X$ is well-founded (essentially, if it contains no infinite $\in$-descending chains), then indeed $\emptyset$ belongs to its transitive closure, that is, either $X=\emptyset$ or $\emptyset\in\bigcup X$ or $\emptyset\in\bigcup\bigcup X$ or... However, this does not mean that there is some $n$ such that the result of iterating the union operation $n$ […]