The goal of this exercise is to use the method of generating functions to verify some results of D.J. Newman and Paul Erdös.

For the purposes of this exercise, an arithmetic progression is a subset of of the form for some fixed naturals with , and we call the common difference of .

Recall that is a partition of a set iff the following hold:

for all .

for all .

.

We want to show the following:

Suppose that is partitioned into finitely many arithmetic progressions . Then either , or at least two of the common differences coincide. Moreover, if denote the common differences, then

To do this, we can use the method of generating functions as follows: Associate to the generating function of :

Verify that

where the last equality is valid for all . (We will need that it is valid for all complex numbers with . You may assume this.)

For , define so that . Find a formula for similar to the formula above for , involving and .

Suppose that and the are all different. Let be the largest of them, and consider

Derive a contradiction by letting .

Consider

and use L’Hôpital’s rule to deduce that

For a positive integer and , let

Suppose that are positive integers and . Show that for any ,

For this, you may want to verify first that the numbers of the form with and run through a complete residue system .

This problem requires some basic facts about matrices, eigenvalues, and traces. A good reference is Sheldon Axler, Linear algebra done right. Springer, 2nd edition (1997), but feel free to ask me if you are not familiar or do not feel comfortable with linear algebra. Let where is an odd integer. Consider the matrix with entry in row , column ().

Show that is a permutation matrix, i.e., all its entries are 0s or 1s, and there is exactly one 1 in each column and each row.

Show that , and conclude that the eigenvalues of are all among .

Verify that the trace of is 1 to conclude that the eigenvalues of are 1 with multiplicity and with multiplicity .

Solve exercises 4.6.9–11 from the textbook.

Typeset using LaTeX2WP. Here is a printable version of this post.

43.614000-116.202000

Advertisements

Like this:

LikeLoading...

Related

This entry was posted on Sunday, October 24th, 2010 at 2:58 pm and is filed under 507: Advanced number theory. You can follow any responses to this entry through the RSS 2.0 feed.
You can leave a response, or trackback from your own site.

I learned of this problem through Su Gao, who heard of it years ago while a post-doc at Caltech. David Gale introduced this game in the 70s, I believe. I am only aware of two references in print: Richard K. Guy. Unsolved problems in combinatorial games. In Games of No Chance, (R. J. Nowakowski ed.) MSRI Publications 29, Cambridge University Press, 1996, pp. […]

Let $C$ be the standard Cantor middle-third set. As a consequence of the Baire category theorem, there are numbers $r$ such that $C+r$ consists solely of irrational numbers, see here. What would be an explicit example of a number $r$ with this property? Short of an explicit example, are there any references addressing this question? A natural approach would […]

Suppose $M$ is an inner model (of $\mathsf{ZF}$) with the same reals as $V$, and let $A\subseteq \mathbb R$ be a set of reals in $M$. Suppose further that $A$ is determined in $M$. Under these assumptions, $A$ is also determined in $V$. The point is that since winning strategies are coded by reals, and any possible run of the game for $A$ is coded by a real, […]

Yes. This is obvious if there are no such cardinals. (I assume that the natural numbers of the universe of sets are the true natural numbers. Otherwise, the answer is no, and there is not much else to do.) Assume now that there are such cardinals, and that "large cardinal axiom" is something reasonable (so, provably in $\mathsf{ZFC}$, the relevant […]

Please send an email to mathrev@ams.org, explaining the issue. (This is our all-purpose email address; any mistakes you discover, not just regarding references, you can let us know there.) Give us some time, I promise we'll get to it. However, if it seems as if the request somehow fell through the cracks, you can always contact one of your friendly edit […]

The relevant search term is ethnomathematics. There are several journals devoted to this topic (for instance, Revista latinoamericana de etnomatemática). Browsing them (if you have access to MathSciNet, the relevant MSC class is 01A70) and looking at their references should help you get started. Another place to look for this is in journals of history of mat […]

Some of the comments in the previous answers make a subtle mistake, and I think it may be worth clarifying some issues. I am assuming the standard sort of set theory in what follows. Cantor's diagonal theorem (mentioned in some of the answers) gives us that for any set $X$, $|X|

For $\lambda$ a scalar, let $[\lambda]$ denote the $1\times 1$ matrix whose sole entry is $\lambda$. Note that for any column vectors $a,b$, we have that $a^\top b=[a\cdot b]$ and $a[\lambda]=\lambda a$. The matrix at hand has the form $A=vw^\top$. For any $u$, we have that $$Au=(vw^\top)u=v(w^\top u)=v[w\cdot u]=(w\cdot u)v.\tag1$$ This means that there are […]

That you can list $K $ does not mean you can list its complement. Perhaps the thing to note to build your intuition is that the program is not listing the elements of $K $ in increasing order. Indeed, maybe program 20 halts on input 20 but only does it after several million steps, while program 19 doesn't halt on input 19 and program 21 halts on input 2 […]

A reasonable follow-up question is whether there are some natural algebraic properties that the class of cardinals satisfies (provably in $\mathsf{ZF}$ or in $\mathsf{ZF}$ together with a weak axiom of choice). This is a natural problem and was investigated by Tarski in the 1940s, see MR0029954 (10,686f). Tarski, Alfred. Cardinal Algebras. With an Appendix: […]