515 – Caratheodory’s characterization of measurability (Homework 3)

This set is due Friday, April 27.

The goal of these problems is to prove Carathéodory‘s theorem that “extracts” a measure from any outer measure. In particular, when applied to Lebesgue outer measure, this construction recovers Lebesgue measure.

Recall that an outer measure on a set is a function such that:

.

implies .

For any subsets of , we have .

Given a set and an outer measure on , let denote the collection of subsets of with the property that

for all .

Prove that is a -algebra on .

This requires some work. You may want to proceed by stages:

First, check that is precisely the collection of sets such that, for any , we have

.

Check that , and that is closed under complements.

Check that is closed under finite unions. Conclude that it is also closed under set theoretic differences: If , then .

The crux of the matter, of course, is to verify that is closed under countable unions. Accordingly, suppose that for all , and let .

Let , and note that , where , and, recursively, for . (Note also that for all .)

Then, for , , and for all ,

Conclude that . (Why does this limit exist?)

Also, prove that . (Again, why does this limit exist?)

Conclude from these inequalities and item 1 that . This concludes the proof that is a -algebra.

Now let denote the restriction of to .

Prove that is a measure space.

In view of what we have proved already, note that this “reduces” to prove that, whenever are pairwise disjoint elements of , then

.

With notation as before, check first that for all , and conclude.

Prove that is in fact a complete measure. Recall that this means that any subset of a set of -measure 0 is measurable and also has measure 0. In fact, check that if , then , and conclude from this.

Suppose that . Show that the restriction of to is an outer measure on . Denote by resp. the set defined above, for resp. . Show that if , then . Suppose that is measurable (i.e., that ). Is ? If so, is this the only case where equality holds?

Prove that if is , Lebesgue outer measure on , then is precisely , Lebesgue measure on . (This may be a bit easier for than in general.)

43.614000-116.202000

Advertisements

Like this:

LikeLoading...

Related

This entry was posted on Thursday, April 12th, 2012 at 2:15 pm and is filed under 515: Analysis II. You can follow any responses to this entry through the RSS 2.0 feed.
You can leave a response, or trackback from your own site.

Craig: For a while, there was some research on improving bounds on the number of variables or degree of unsolvable Diophantine equations. Unfortunately, I never got around to cataloging the known results in any systematic way, so all I can offer is some pointers to relevant references, but I am not sure of what the current records are. Perhaps the first pape […]

Yes. Consider, for instance, Conway's base 13 function $c$, or any function that is everywhere discontinuous and has range $\mathbb R$ in every interval. Pick continuous bijections $f_n:\mathbb R\to(-1/n,1/n)$ for $n\in\mathbb N^+$. Pick a strictly decreasing sequence $(x_n)_{n\ge1}$ converging to $0$. Define $f$ by setting $f(x)=0$ if $x=0$ or $\pm x_n […]

(1) Patrick Dehornoy gave a nice talk at the Séminaire Bourbaki explaining Hugh Woodin's approach. It omits many technical details, so you may want to look at it before looking again at the Notices papers. I think looking at those slides and then at the Notices articles gives a reasonable picture of what the approach is and what kind of problems remain […]

The description below comes from József Beck. Combinatorial games. Tic-tac-toe theory, Encyclopedia of Mathematics and its Applications, 114. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, 2008, MR2402857 (2009g:91038). Given a finite set $S$ of points in the plane $\mathbb R^2$, consider the following game between two players Maker and Breaker. The players alternat […]

Yes. This is a consequence of the Davis-Matiyasevich-Putnam-Robinson work on Hilbert's 10th problem, and some standard number theory. A number of papers have details of the $\Pi^0_1$ sentence. To begin with, take a look at the relevant paper in Mathematical developments arising from Hilbert's problems (Proc. Sympos. Pure Math., Northern Illinois Un […]

It is easy to see without choice that if there is a surjection from $A$ onto $B$, then there is an injection from ${\mathcal P}(B)$ into ${\mathcal P}(A)$, and the result follows from Cantor's theorem that $B

Only noticed this question today. Although the selected answer is quite nice and arguably simpler than the argument below, none of the posted answers address what appeared to be the original intent of establishing the inequality using the Arithmetic Mean-Geometric Mean Inequality. For this, simply notice that $$ 1+3+\ldots+(2n-1)=n^2, $$ which can be easily […]

First of all, $f(z)+e^z\ne 0$ by the first inequality. It follows that $e^z/(f(z)+e^z)$ is entire, and bounded above. You should be able to conclude from that.

Yes. The standard way of defining these sequences goes by assigning in an explicit fashion to each limit ordinal $\alpha$, for as long as possible, an increasing sequence $\alpha_n$ that converges to $\alpha$. Once this is done, we can define $f_\alpha$ by diagonalizing, so $f_\alpha(n)=f_{\alpha_n}(n)$ for all $n$. Of course there are many possible choices […]

I disagree with the advice of sending a paper to a journal before searching the relevant literature. It is almost guaranteed that a paper on the fundamental theorem of algebra (a very classical and well-studied topic) will be rejected if you do not include mention on previous proofs, and comparisons, explaining how your proof differs from them, etc. It is no […]