Instructor: Andres Caicedo. Contact Information: See here. Time: MWF 10:30-11:45 am. Place: Business, Room 204. Office Hours: Th 3-4:30 (starting Jan. 31), or by appointment (email me a few times/dates you have available).

Text: Calculus (Michael Spivak), fourth edn. Publish or Perish, Inc. Here are some reviews.

If you want an additional text to supplement your reading, I suggest Calculus. Whitman College (David Guichard and others). The text is distributed under a Creative Commons license. It can be downloaded from Whitman’s page. You may also want to consider as an amusing, quick reference, The cartoon guide to Calculus (Larry Gonick).

Contents: The department’s course description reads:

Definitions of limit, derivative and integral. Computation of the derivative, including logarithmic, exponential and trigonometric functions. Applications of the derivative, approximations, optimization, mean value theorem. Fundamental Theorem of Calculus, brief introduction to applications of the integral and to computations of antiderivatives.

We will see some applications, but our emphasis is on understanding the theory. The material to cover is roughly the first 18-and-a-bit chapters of Spivak’s book.

The grade will be decided based on homework, quizzes, and a final exam (20%). The date of the final is Monday, May 13, 12-2 pm. Details of homework and quiz policy will be given in due time.

I post links to supplementary material on Google+. Circle me and let me know if you are interested, and I’ll add you to my Calculus circle.

43.614000-116.202000

Like this:

LikeLoading...

Related

This entry was posted on Wednesday, January 23rd, 2013 at 4:33 pm and is filed under 170: Calculus I. You can follow any responses to this entry through the RSS 2.0 feed.
You can leave a response, or trackback from your own site.

Yes. This is a consequence of the Davis-Matiyasevich-Putnam-Robinson work on Hilbert's 10th problem, and some standard number theory. A number of papers have details of the $\Pi^0_1$ sentence. To begin with, take a look at the relevant paper in Mathematical developments arising from Hilbert's problems (Proc. Sympos. Pure Math., Northern Illinois Un […]

I am looking for references discussing two inequalities that come up in the study of the dynamics of Newton's method on real-valued polynomials (in one variable). The inequalities are fairly different, but it seems to make sense to ask about both of them in the same post. Most of the details below are fairly elementary, they are mostly included for comp […]

Let $C$ be the standard Cantor middle-third set. As a consequence of the Baire category theorem, there are numbers $r$ such that $C+r$ consists solely of irrational numbers, see here. What would be an explicit example of a number $r$ with this property? Short of an explicit example, are there any references addressing this question? A natural approach would […]

Not necessarily. That $\mathfrak m$ is consistently singular is proved in MR0947850 (89m:03045) Kunen, Kenneth. Where $\mathsf{MA}$ first fails. J. Symbolic Logic 53(2), (1988), 429–433. There, Ken shows that $\mathfrak{m}$ can be singular of cofinality $\omega_1$. (Both links above are behind paywalls.)

Ignas: It is not possible to provide an explicit expression for a non-linear solution. The reason is that (it is a folklore result that) an additive $f:{\mathbb R}\to{\mathbb R}$ is linear iff it is measurable. (This result can be found in a variety of places, it is a standard exercise in measure theory books. As of this writing, there is a short proof here. […]

Following Tomas's suggestion, I am posting this as an answer: I encountered this problem while directing a Master's thesis two years ago, and again (in a different setting) with another thesis last year. I seem to recall that I somehow got to this while reading slides of a talk by Paul Pollack. Anyway, I like to deduce the results asked in the prob […]

This is a beautiful and truly fundamental result, and so there are several good quality presentations. Try MR1321144. Kanamori, Akihiro. The higher infinite. Large cardinals in set theory from their beginnings. Perspectives in Mathematical Logic. Springer-Verlag, Berlin, 1994. xxiv+536 pp. ISBN: 3-540-57071-3, or any of the newer editions (the 2003 second ed […]

Given any field automorphism of $\mathbb C$, the rational numbers are fixed. In fact, any number that is explicitly definable in $\mathbb C$ (in the first order language of fields) is fixed. (Actually, this means that we can only ensure that the rationals are fixed, I expand on this below.) Any construction of a wild automorphism uses the axiom of choice. Se […]

The Milner-Rado paradox is only a paradox in the traditional sense of the word: there are no inconsistencies here, but rather the result is (perhaps naively) seen as counter-intuitive. There are two reasons here: First, if $\alpha=\bigcup_{n

The question immediately reminded me of this. Here is an argument following the same basic idea at the beginning of that argument: First, consider $B=\{x\in A\mid A\cap(-\infty,x]$ is countable$\}$, and note that $B$ itself is countable: The point is that if $x\in B$ then $A\cap(-\infty,x]\subseteq B$. Now, if $B\ne\emptyset$, let $t=\sup B$, fix an increasi […]