Mérida, XI SLALM, 1998

This one is incredible. No beard, and I do not look yet like an orca.

I’m in the last row, sort of in the middle. Xavier Caicedo is on the second row, to the left. My friend Juan Carlos Rivera is on the last row as well. I should probably stop now.

Advertisement

MSRI, The continuum hypothesis, 2001

Workshop, May 29 – June 01, 2001. Apparently continuing with the nostalgia theme.

Here is the list of participants.

Paris, Logic Colloquium 2000

I ran into this picture a few days ago, when looking at the old photos from the Martin Conference. I posted here the group picture from that conference. John Steel should be posting the other pictures soon (well, I’ve been waiting since 2001, so we’ll see), or I may post them if that ends up not happening.

This one is the conference photo from the Logic Colloquium 2000. The website has many other pictures available as well. It was an interesting meeting.

Paris, July 23 – 31, 2000. The meeting site will be the Sorbonne, where David Hilbert presented his famous list of problems at the International Congress of Mathematicians in August 1900.

As I recall, at the opening we listened to a recording of part of Hilbert’s address, including his Wir müssen wissen. Wir werden wissen.

I like this picture very much. You can see me behind Joel Hamkins, in what seems to be row eight. (I believe I met Joel and his wife, Barbara Gail Montero, at this conference.) Paul Larson still has hair.

SQuaREs, 2013

This week (May 20-May 24) I am in Palo Alto, at the American Institute of Mathematics, for the third year of a SQuaRE meeting on Descriptive aspects of Inner model theory. The previous two meetings are mentioned here and here. See also this post on some of our results.

This time two other SQuaRE meetings are happening simultaneously, one on the Possible shape of the numerical ranges for certain classes of matrices, and one on Singular cardinal combinatorics. Here you have the two set theory-related groups:

From left to right: Menachem Magidor, Paul Larson, Grigor Sargsyan, John Steel, Martin Zeman, me, Assaf Rinot, Dima Sinapova, James Cummings, Sy Friedman, and Ralf Schindler.

Olden days

Martin Conference, Berkeley, May 27-28, 2001.

(If someone has a version in higher resolution, or pictures of the conference, please contact John Steel, or myself.)

Summer Kisner – Schur’s theorem

My student Summer Kisner completed her M.S. this term, and graduated on Saturday.

2013–5-18 Summer

Here is a copy of the slides she used on her defense. (The slides display incorrectly on my computer, but it seems to be a problem on my end. If it is not, please let me know, and I’ll see what I can do.)

Her thesis, Schur’s theorem and related topics in Ramsey theory, discusses Schur’s theorem, one of the first result in what we now call Ramsey theory. The result states that if the positive integers are partitioned into finitely many sets, , then for some , , there are integers (not necessarily different), all of them in , such that . One usually describes this in terms of colors: We color the positive integers with finitely many colors, and there is a monochromatic triple with .

This result is a cornerstone of Ramsey theory. It was significantly generalized by Rado (using the notion of partition regularity), and is connected to van der Waerden’s and Szemerédi’s famous results.

Nowadays, Schur’s theorem is typically proved as a corollary of Ramsey’s theorem. This is usually stated in terms of graphs, but I will use the notation from the partition calculus. Let denote the collection of -sized subsets of the set . Suppose that is infinite, and consider a coloring , where the set of colors is finite. Ramsey’s theorem asserts that under these assumptions, there is an infinite subset of that is homogeneous or monochromatic for , in the sense that assigns the same color to all -sized subsets of . In fact, we have finitary versions of this result: For any and any , if we only require that has size at least , then there is an such that it suffices to assume that has size at least . Even for , the study of Ramsey numbers, the least seen as a function of , proves to be incredibly difficult and computationally unfeasible. For example, if , then we know that , but its exact value is not known.

To deduce Schur’s theorem from Ramsey’s, let be such that, for any for coloring of using colors, there is a monochromatic set of size . The least such we denote . We want to show that if , then there is a monochromatic solution to the equation . In fact, we claim that it suffices to consider rather than the whole set of positive integers. Indeed, given a partition , consider the coloring of where if , then the set $\{a,b\}$ has color , where . By definition of , we can find such that all have the same color. Now notice that , that is, are monochromatic for the original coloring of .

An easy inductive argument gives us that , so this gives the upper bound for the so-called -th Schur number . To see the upper bound , note that , and verify inductively that : Suppose that , and consider a coloring of with . Fix an element , and note that for some color there are elements such that has color . Let be the set of all these , that is, has color . Note that if for some we have that has color as well, then is monochromatic with color . Hence we may assume that the coloring, restricted to , only uses colors. We are now done, since .

Schur’s original proof predated Ramsey, and gives a slightly better bound than . Indeed, from his proof, we obtain that .

In terms of lower bounds, one can quickly check by induction that . Indeed, , since . Given a coloring of using colors and without monochromatic triples, we describe a coloring of using colors , again without monochromatic triples. This gives the result. To define , start by letting for . Now let for , and finally let for .

Slightly better bounds are known. For example, Anne Penfold Street shows that in

 W.D. Wallis, Anne Penfold Street, Jennifer Seberry Wallis. Combinatorics: Room squares, sum-free sets, Hadamard matrices. Lecture Notes in Mathematics, Vol. 292. Springer-Verlag, Berlin-New York, (1972). MR0392580 (52 #13397).

Schur proved his theorem in order to establish a result related to Fermat’s last theorem, namely that it cannot be established by a naive argument involving modular arithmetic: Suppose that are integers, and . Then, for any prime , the equality holds modulo and, if is large enough, then we also have that . Hence, to prove that Fermat’s equation admits no solutions , it would suffice to show that there are arbitrarily large primes such that must divide one of . What Schur proved is that this is not possible and, indeed, for any and all sufficiently large primes , there are nontrivial solutions to Fermat’s equation modulo . To see this, let and let be the subgroup of consisting of -th powers. Then is union of cosets of , say where the displayed sets are disjoint. Note that . Now color using colors, by letting have color iff . By choice of , we have a monochromatic Schur triple, that is, there are such that and for some . But then there are , all nonzero modulo , such that , , and , so is a nontrivial solution to Fermat’s equation modulo .

It is actually an interesting problem to try and determine the optimal size of as a function of . Fourier-analytic methods give here the best known bounds. Cornacchia proved in 1909 that , at least if itself is prime.

Let me close with an open problem: We could consider a multiplicative (rather than additive) version of Schur’s theorem: For any there is an such that if is colored using colors, then there is a monochromatic set with . Indeed, this follows as a simple corollary of Schur’s result: Just note that , since we could just color the powers of two and apply the additive version. what if we combine the two? It is still open whether in any finite coloring of there are integers such that all receive the same color. This was originally asked by Hindman.

BEST

BEST 2013 and NSF funded travel awards – Announcement 3

DATES: June 16 – 19, 2013

PLACE: University of Nevada, Las Vegas

Please consult the conference webpage.
The 20-th meeting of BEST will be hosted at University of Nevada, Las Vegas, as a AAAS-PD symposium during June 16 (Sunday) – June 19 (Wednesday), 2013. It is organized by Liljana Babinkostova, Andrés Caicedo, Sam Coskey  and Marion Scheepers.

Contributed and invited talks will be held on Monday, Tuesday and possibly Wednesday at the University of Las Vegas, Nevada.

BEST PLENARY SPEAKERS: The four invited plenary speakers are:

1. Todd Eisworth (Ohio University).
2. Masaru Kada (Osaka Prefecture University, Japan).
3. Thilo Weinert (University of Bonn, Germany).
4. Lynne Yengulalp (University of Dayton).

In addition to these four plenary talks, the program has ten reserved speaking slots for students, four reserved slots for post-docs and 2 reserved slots for pre-tenure tenure track faculty, and several slots for contributed talks.

TRAVEL AWARDS:  Graduate students speakers, post-doc speakers and pre-tenure tenure track speakers are strongly encouraged to apply for to BEST for an NSF-funded travel award.  The travel expenses (airfare and lodging) of awarded speakers will be reimbursed up to the $700 maximum amount of the award, and registration fees of awardees will be reimbursed.

1. There are ten (10) travel awards of up to $700 plus registration fee available for graduate student presenters.
2. There are four (4) travel awards of up to $700 plus registration fee available for post-doc presenters.
3. There are two (2) travel awards of up to $700 plus registration fee available for pre-tenure, tenure track faculty members.

STUDENT SPEAKERS: BEST seeks to promote student participation in the conference via short (20 minute) presentations. To this end there are ten (10) NSF funded BEST travel awards available for students. To apply for one of these awards,

1. Prior to May 25, 2013 submit an abstract for the proposed presentation at the abstract submission site.
2. Prior to June 10, 2013 submit a resume including current affiliation, advisor name and stage of study, and a separate statement of goals.
3. Prior to June 10, 2013 have the advisor separately submit a recommendation letter, outlining the benefit of participation in the conference via presentation to the student.

In addition to the BEST travel awards, up to 20 travel awards of up to $150 each are also available from the AAAS-PD to help students (including students participating in BEST) defray travel expenses to participate in the AAAS-PD annual meeting.

Student speakers are also  eligible for a AAAS-PD award of excellence for their presentation at BEST 20. Winners of these awards will be announced at the AAAS-PD banquet on June 18, 2013. Student participants will be guests at this banquet.

POST-DOC and PRE-TENURE TENURE TRACK SPEAKERS: BEST also seeks to be a forum for early career set theoretic scholars. In particular there are four (4) NSF funded BEST travel awards available for post-docs, and two (2) NSF funded BEST travel awards available for pre-tenure tenure track faculty. To apply for one of these awards,

1. Prior to May 25, 2013 submit an abstract for a proposed 25 minute presentation at the abstract submission site.
2. In the case of an application for a BEST post-doc travel award, prior to June 10, 2013 submit a resume including current affiliation, post-doc mentor  name, and a list of publications, and a separate statement that addresses the applicant’s professional goals, and availability of travel funds.
3. In the case of an application for a BEST tenure track, pre-tenure, travel award, prior  to June 10, 2013 submit a resume including current affiliation, years towards tenure, a current list of publications, and a separate statement that addresses the applicant’s professional goals, and availability of travel funds.

CONTRIBUTED TALKS:  The BEST schedule will also have a number of slots for 25 minute contributed talks. Anyone wishing to speak at BEST 20 should submit an abstract as soon as possible (prior to June 10) at the abstract submission site. It is strongly recommended to also contact one of the organizers as soon as possible to indicate interest/intention in presenting a talk at BEST 20.

Important deadlines:

DEADLINE 1: REGISTRATION: Please consult the registration page. Early registration ends May 31. After that only on-site registration will be possible. Registration fees are dependent on date of registration. We kindly request that tenure track mathematicians planning to participate in BEST 20 consider acting as judges for the student presentations. The registration form has a place where willingness to act as a judge can be indicated. There are also a number of excursions available that can be indicated on the registration form. Also please consider attending the award banquet – meal choices are available on the registration form.

DEADLINE 2: ABSTRACTS: Atlas Conferences, Inc. is providing abstract services for BEST 20. Abstracts submitted by April 24 will appear in the proceedings of the annual conference of the AAAS-PD. The deadline for submitting an abstract is June 10. To submit an abstract, follow this link.

LODGING: Las Vegas offers many lodging options. Please see the lodging page on the conference website for lodging suggestions by the AAAS-PD.

1941

Because of this, I decided to take a look at Cardinal Algebras, a monograph by Alfred Tarski, né Alfred Teitelbaum, published by Oxford University Press in 1949.

Here is the closing paragraph of the Preface:

It would be impossible for me to conclude this introduction without mentioning one more name—that of Adolf Lindenbaum, a former student and colleague of mine at the University of Warsaw. My close friend and collaborator for many years, he took a very active part in the earlier stages of the research which resulted in the present work, and the few references to his contribution that will be found in the book can hardly convey an adequate idea of the extent of my indebtedness. The wave of organized totalitarian barbarism engulfed this man of unusual intelligence and great talent—as it did millions of others.

Adolf Lindenbaum was killed by the Gestapo in 1941.