(If someone has a version in higher resolution, or pictures of the conference, please contact John Steel, or myself.)

A very incomplete key, possibly with mistakes:

First row: ?, Diego Rojas-Rebolledo, ?, Leo Harrington, Ernest Schimmerling.

Second: Peter Koekpe; Alexandra, Hugh, and Christine Woodin; Xianghui Shi, me, John Clemens.

Third: John Steel, Alessandro Andretta, Tony Martin.

Fourth: Stevo Todorcevic, Paul Corazza, Philip Welch, Ilijah Farah, Qi Feng, ?, Martin Zeman, Robert Solovay, Richard Laver, Erik Closson (?), James Cummings.

Fifth: ?, Itay Neeman, Thomas Jech, Greg Hjorth, Joan Moschovakis (?), Yiannis Moschovakis, Matthew Foreman (?), Ted Slaman, Jindra Zapletal, Joan Bagaria.

Sixth: Benedikt Löwe, ?, Jean Larson, Bill Mitchell, ?, Carlos di Prisco, ?, Mike Oliver, ?, Lorenz Halbeisen, Derrick Duboise, Peter Koellner.

Seventh, etc: Herb Enderton, ?, ?, Joel Hamkins, Alain Louveau, Slawomir Solecki, ?, Mack Stanley, ?, ?, Tomek Bartoszynski, Paul Larson, Lisa Marks, Richard Ketchersid. ?

Like this:

LikeLoading...

Related

This entry was posted on Thursday, May 23rd, 2013 at 10:26 pm and is filed under Conferences, Life. You can follow any responses to this entry through the RSS 2.0 feed.
You can leave a response, or trackback from your own site.

[…] this picture a few days ago, when looking at the old photos from the Martin Conference. I posted here the group picture from that conference. John Steel should be posting the other pictures soon (well, […]

The argument you are looking for is given in Kanamori's book, see Theorem 28.15. For the more nuanced version of the lemma, see section 7D in Moschovakis's descriptive set theory book (particularly 7.D.5-8), or section 3.1 in the Koellner-Woodin chapter of the Handbook.

This problem is very much open. Cheng Yong calls Harrington's $\star$ the assumption that there is a real $x$ such that all $x$-admissible ordinals are $L$-cardinals. From the work of Yong we know that Second- and even Third-order arithmetic do not suffice to prove that Harrington's $\star$ implies the existence of $0^\sharp$. Whether this was poss […]

Georgii: Let me start with some brief remarks. In a series of three papers: a. Wacław Sierpiński, "Contribution à la théorie des séries divergentes", Comp. Rend. Soc. Sci. Varsovie 3 (1910) 89–93 (in Polish). b. Wacław Sierpiński, "Remarque sur la théorème de Riemann relatif aux séries semi-convergentes", Prac. Mat. Fiz. XXI (1910) 17–20 […]

What precisely do you mean by a standard model? An $\omega$-model? (That is, a model whose set of natural numbers is isomorphic to $\omega$.) Or a $\beta$-model? (That is, a model whose ordinals are well-ordered.) If the latter, the Mostowski collapse theorem tells us any such model is isomorphic in a unique way to a unique transitive model. If the former, t […]

This is Theorem 39 in the paper (see Theorem 4.(i) for a user-friendly preview). But the fact that $(2^\kappa)^+\to(\kappa^+)^2_\kappa$ is older (1946) and due to Erdős, see here: Paul Erdős. Some set-theoretical properties of graphs, Univ. Nac. Tucumán. Revista A. 3 (1942), 363-367 MR5,151d. (Anyway, it is probably easier to read a more modern presentation, […]

There is a fairly extense literature detailing uses of determinacy in a variety of situations. A good place to start is Akihiro Kanamori's The higher infinite. The last part of the book is devoted to determinacy. Eventually, Aki concentrates on the question of the consistency of determinacy from large cardinals, but before getting there, he provides man […]

I. Some of the answers reveal a confusion, so let me start with the definition. If $I$ is an interval, and $f:I\to\mathbb R$, we say that $f$ has the intermediate value property iff whenever $a

My favorite family of examples come from the partition calculus. The original proof of the Baumgartner-Hajnal theorem $\omega_1\to (\alpha)^2_n$ for all finite $ n $ and all countable $\alpha $ appealed to the absoluteness of well-foundedness. The homogeneous set was found in an extension where $\mathsf{MA} $ holds, and that means that a certain ground-model […]

It is not possible to give a finitary proof of this fact. Consider, for instance, the statement that all Goodstein sequences terminate. This is an arithmetic claim, it is independent of $\mathsf{PA}$, and it is equivalent to the claim that some (very specific) computable non-increasing sequences of polynomial towers stabilize. Instead of Goodstein sequences, […]

Given any field automorphism of $\mathbb C$, the rational numbers are fixed. In fact, any number that is explicitly definable in $\mathbb C$ (in the first order language of fields) is fixed. (Actually, this means that we can only ensure that the rationals are fixed, I expand on this below.) Any construction of a wild automorphism uses the axiom of choice. Se […]

I’ll try to post a key over the next few days. [

Edit:Added, though terribly incomplete.][…] this picture a few days ago, when looking at the old photos from the Martin Conference. I posted here the group picture from that conference. John Steel should be posting the other pictures soon (well, […]