414/514 Homework 2 – Monotone and Baire one functions

This set is due in three weeks, on Monday, November 3, at the beginning of lecture.

1. Let be increasing. We know that and exist for all , and that has at most countably many points of discontinuity, say For each let be the intervals and . Some of these intervals may be empty, but for each at least one of them is not. (Here we follow the convention that and .) Let denote the length of the interval , and say that an interval precedes a point iff .

Verify that and, more generally, for any ,

precedes precedes .

Define a function by setting . Show that is increasing and continuous.

Now, for each , define so that , , and for all . Show that each is increasing, and its only discontinuity points are .

Prove that uniformly.

Use this to provide a (new) proof that increasing functions are in Baire class one.

2. Solve exercise 3.Q in the van Rooij-Schikhof book: If is such that for all , we have that and exist, then is the uniform limit of a sequence of step functions. The approach suggested in the book is the following:

Show that it suffices to argue that for every there is a step function such that for all .

To do this, consider the set there is a step function on such that for all .

Show that is non-empty. Show that if and , then also . This shows that is an interval or , with . Show that in fact the second possibility occurs, that is, . For this, the assumption that exists is useful. Finally, show that . For this, use now the assumption that exists.

3.(This problem is optional.) Find a counterexample to the following statement: If is the pointwise limit of a sequence of functions , then there is a dense subset where the convergence is in fact uniform. What if and the functions are continuous? Can you find a (reasonable) weakening of the statement that is true?

4. (This is example 1.1 in Andrew Bruckner’s Differentiation of real functions, CRM monograph series, AMS, 1994. MR1274044(94m:26001).) We want to define a function . Let be the Cantor set in . Whenever is one of the components of the complement of , we define for . For not covered by this case, we define . Verify that is a Darboux continuous function, and that it is discontinuous at every point of .

Verify that is not of Baire class one, but that there is a Baire class one function that coincides with except at (some of) the endpoints of intervals as above.

This entry was posted on Friday, October 10th, 2014 at 12:45 pm and is filed under 414/514: Analysis I. You can follow any responses to this entry through the RSS 2.0 feed.
You can leave a response, or trackback from your own site.

3 Responses to 414/514 Homework 2 – Monotone and Baire one functions

I have corrected the definition of the function in problem 1. Thanks to Jeremy Siegert for noticing the typo in the original version, and for noting that an should be .

Thanks to Stuart Nygard for noticing a further typo in question 2 (some should have been s). Fixed now.

In problem 1 we are supposed to show that each is discontinuous on the points . There is no based on how we indexed ‘s points of discontinuity, but it looks as though is discontinuous at . Should it be that each is discontinuous on ?

Marginalia to a theorem of Silver (see also this link) by Keith I. Devlin and R. B. Jensen, 1975. A humble title and yet, undoubtedly, one of the most important papers of all time in set theory.

Given a positive integer $a$, the Ramsey number $R(a)$ is the least $n$ such that whenever the edges of the complete graph $K_n$ are colored using only two colors, we necessarily have a copy of $K_a$ with all its edges of the same color. For example, $R(3)= 6$, which is usually stated by saying that in a party of 6 people, necessarily there are 3 that know e […]

No, this is not consistent. Todorčević has shown in ZF that, in fact, there is no function $F\!:\mathcal W(S)\to S$ with the property you require. Here, $\mathcal W(S)$ is the collection of subsets of $S$ that are well-orderable. This is corollary 6 in MR0793235 (87d:03126). Todorčević, Stevo. Partition relations for partially ordered sets. Acta Math. 155 (1 […]

As suggested by Gerald, the notion was first introduced for groups. Given a directed system of groups, their direct limit was defined as a quotient of their direct product (which was referred to as their "weak product"). The general notion is a clear generalization, although the original reference only deals with groups. As mentioned by Cameron Zwa […]

A database of number fields, by Jürgen Klüners and Gunter Malle. (Note this is not the same as the one mentioned in this answer.) The site also provides links to similar databases.

Let me add something to Noah's nice answer. If there are transitive set models of set theory, then there are such models of $V=L$, and therefore there is a countable $\alpha$ such that $L_\alpha$ is a model (by the Löwenheim–Skolem theorem and condensation). Since $L_\alpha$ is countable, for any forcing poset $\mathbb P\in L_\alpha$ there are (in $L$) […]

The answer depends on the underlying set theory and the actual symbol under consideration, whether $\in$ or $\subseteq$. In standard (ZF) set theory, the axiom of foundation prevents the existence of any set as specified. The reason is that sets have a rank, and the rank of any member of a set $A$ is strictly smaller than that of $A$. However, the rank of po […]

Sure. A large class of examples comes from the partition calculus. A simple result of the kind I have in mind is the following: Any infinite graph contains either a copy of the complete graph on countably many vertices or of the independent graph on countably many vertices. However, if we want to find an uncountable complete or independent graph, it is not e […]

I think that, from a modern point of view, there is a misunderstanding in the position that you suggest in your question. Really, "set theory" should be understood as an umbrella term that covers a whole hierarchy of ZFC-related theories. Perhaps one of the most significant advances in foundations is the identification of the consistency strength h […]

I'll only discuss the first question. As pointed out by Asaf, the argument is not correct, but something interesting can be said anyway. There are a couple of issues. A key problem is with the idea of an "explicitly constructed" set. Indeed, for instance, there are explicitly constructed sets of reals that are uncountable and of size continuum […]

I have corrected the definition of the function in problem 1. Thanks to Jeremy Siegert for noticing the typo in the original version, and for noting that an should be .

Thanks to Stuart Nygard for noticing a further typo in question 2 (some should have been s). Fixed now.

In problem 1 we are supposed to show that each is discontinuous on the points . There is no based on how we indexed ‘s points of discontinuity, but it looks as though is discontinuous at . Should it be that each is discontinuous on ?

Yes, exactly.