Problem 1 is Exercise 7.7.64 from the book. It asks to determine the convergence of

There are several ways of approaching this problem.

Method 1: Begin by noting that

and so

can be evaluated by using the substitution so which transforms the integral into

that can be solved with the trig. substitution so and

Now we return to the problem:

We have found the value of the integral, so in particular, it converges.

Method 2: First,

We use comparison for both and

If Since

we have by comparison that is finite.

If Since

we have by comparison that is also finite.

Hence, converges.

Method 3: As before,

The change of variables transforms into

and

which of course is the same as

So all we need to do is to show that converges, and for this we can use comparison, because

and

Problem 2 is an easier version of Exercise 7.7.63 from the book. It asks to determine the convergence of

The problem here is that we cannot find so we are forced to use comparison. A natural thing to try would be to compare with

Since we have

The problem is that has an asymptote at 0. However, we can split the integral as

The first integral is finite, simply because it is the integral of a continuous function on some finite interval, there is nothing improper here. The second converges by comparison with the -integral with

It follows that the whole integral converges.

A slightly different approach is to use limit comparison rather than direct comparison:

It follows that converges because does; and we have to treat

as above. We cannot just compare with (which happens to diverge), because the limit comparison test requires that the functions that we compare are continuous, and is not continuous at 0.

Typeset using LaTeX2WP. Here is a printable version of this post.

This entry was posted on Friday, November 13th, 2009 at 2:32 pm and is filed under 175: Calculus II. You can follow any responses to this entry through the RSS 2.0 feed.
You can leave a response, or trackback from your own site.

A database of number fields, by Jürgen Klüners and Gunter Malle. (Note this is not the same as the one mentioned in this answer.) The site also provides links to similar databases.

As the other answer indicates, the yes answer to your question is known as the De Bruijn-Erdős theorem. This holds regardless of the size of the graph. The De Bruijn–Erdős theorem is a particular instance of what in combinatorics we call a compactness argument or Rado's selection principle, and its truth can be seen as a consequence of the topological c […]

Every $P_c$ has the size of the reals. For instance, suppose $\sum_n a_n=c$ and start by writing $\mathbb N=A\cup B$ where $\sum_{n\in A}a_n$ converges absolutely (to $a$, say). This is possible because $a_n\to 0$: Let $m_0

Consider a subset $\Omega$ of $\mathbb R$ of size $\aleph_1$ and ordered in type $\omega_1$. (This uses the axiom of choice.) Let $\mathcal F$ be the $\sigma$-algebra generated by the initial segments of $\Omega$ under the well-ordering (so all sets in $\mathcal F$ are countable or co-countable), with the measure that assigns $0$ to the countable sets and $1 […]

You assume $\omega_\alpha\subseteq M$ and $X\in M$ so that $X$ belongs to the transitive collapse of $M$ (because if $\pi$ is the collapsing map, $\pi(X)=\pi[X]=X$. You assume $|M|=\aleph_\alpha$ so that the transitive collapse of $M$ has size $\aleph_\alpha$. Since you also have that this transitive collapse is of the form $L_\beta$ for some $\beta$, it fol […]

No, this is not possible. Dave L. Renfro wrote an excellent historical Essay on nowhere analytic $C^\infty$ functions in two parts (with numerous references). See here: 1 (dated May 9, 2002 6:18 PM), and 2 (dated May 19, 2002 8:29 PM). As indicated in part 1, in Zygmunt Zahorski. Sur l'ensemble des points singuliers d'une fonction d'une variab […]

I don't think you need too much in terms of prerequisites. An excellent reference is MR3616119. Tomkowicz, Grzegorz(PL-CEG2); Wagon, Stan(1-MACA-NDM). The Banach-Tarski paradox. Second edition. With a foreword by Jan Mycielski. Encyclopedia of Mathematics and its Applications, 163. Cambridge University Press, New York, 2016. xviii+348 pp. ISBN: 978-1-10 […]

For the second problem, write $x=-3+x'$ and so on. You have $x'+y'+z'=17$ and $x',\dots$ are nonnegative, a case you know how to solve. You can also solve the first problem this way; now you would set $x=1+x'$, etc.