This set is due in three weeks, on Monday, November 3, at the beginning of lecture.
1. Let be increasing. We know that
and
exist for all
, and that
has at most countably many points of discontinuity, say
For each
let
be the intervals
and
. Some of these intervals may be empty, but for each
at least one of them is not. (Here we follow the convention that
and
.) Let
denote the length of the interval
, and say that an interval
precedes a point
iff
.
Verify that and, more generally, for any
,
precedes
precedes
.
Define a function by setting
. Show that
is increasing and continuous.
Now, for each , define
so that
,
, and
for all
. Show that each
is increasing, and its only discontinuity points are
.
Prove that uniformly.
Use this to provide a (new) proof that increasing functions are in Baire class one.
2. Solve exercise 3.Q in the van Rooij-Schikhof book: If is such that for all
, we have that
and
exist, then
is the uniform limit of a sequence of step functions. The approach suggested in the book is the following:
Show that it suffices to argue that for every there is a step function
such that
for all
.
To do this, consider the set there is a step function
on
such that
for all
.
Show that is non-empty. Show that if
and
, then also
. This shows that
is an interval
or
, with
. Show that in fact the second possibility occurs, that is,
. For this, the assumption that
exists is useful. Finally, show that
. For this, use now the assumption that
exists.
3. (This problem is optional.) Find a counterexample to the following statement: If is the pointwise limit of a sequence of functions
, then there is a dense subset
where the convergence is in fact uniform. What if
and the functions
are continuous? Can you find a (reasonable) weakening of the statement that is true?
4. (This is example 1.1 in Andrew Bruckner’s Differentiation of real functions, CRM monograph series, AMS, 1994. MR1274044 (94m:26001).) We want to define a function . Let
be the Cantor set in
. Whenever
is one of the components of the complement of
, we define
for
. For
not covered by this case, we define
. Verify that
is a Darboux continuous function, and that it is discontinuous at every point of
.
Verify that is not of Baire class one, but that there is a Baire class one function that coincides with
except at (some of) the endpoints of intervals
as above.
Verify that is in Baire class two.
I have corrected the definition of the function
in problem 1. Thanks to Jeremy Siegert for noticing the typo in the original version, and for noting that an
should be
.
Thanks to Stuart Nygard for noticing a further typo in question 2 (some
should have been
s). Fixed now.
In problem 1 we are supposed to show that each
is discontinuous on the points
. There is no
based on how we indexed
‘s points of discontinuity, but it looks as though
is discontinuous at
. Should it be that each
is discontinuous on
?
Yes, exactly.